CreditCards.com

Research, regulation, industry reports

Poll: Economic stimulus money went to credit card payments, savings

Connie Prater

There’s doubt about just how much the $168 billion economic stimulus package of tax breaks and rebates actually stimulated the economy.  A new Harris Interactive poll released today compares what people said (when asked back in April) they would spend their stimulus checks on and what they claimed to have actually used it for when polled last month.

Reality checks
“While the government hoped that the checks would be spent to spur the economy, the reality was different,” according to the Harris report. The nationwide poll compared April and August responses and interviewed 2,710 U.S. adults. Nearly seven out of 10 (71 percent) said they had received a rebate check.

Of those, 36 percent report using the money to reduce non-mortgage, debt such as bills and credit card debt and 29 percent report they added to their cash savings.

More than a fifth (21 percent) say they spent the money on other things they wanted to buy and about one in 10 (11 percent) say they took leisure trips with the rebates. The other spending categories included home improvements (14 percent), restaurants and dining out (12 percent) and technology devices or entertainment events (5 percent).

“As predicted … much of the rebate money ended up deposited in savings or being mailed to credit card issuers. Retailers did try their best to get some of the rebate money, but that did not end up occurring as much as they, and probably the White House, wanted,” according to Harris. “What seemed like a great economic fix in the earlier part of the year, though, has not panned out, according to the results of the study.”

Note that some might argue that paying down credit card debt to a bank or lender, which then turns around and loans a portion of that money to other borrowers to buy goods, may also indirectly spur the economy.

Credit card delinquency rates down in Q2
The Harris poll results are bolstered by data released a day earlier by TransUnion.com, the national credit bureau that tracks credit spending and payment habits each quarter. During the second quarter of 2008 — when many people received stimulus checks and rebates — the delinquency rate on credit card accounts dipped by 12.6 percent from the first quarter of the year, to 1.04 percent.

“The lower delinquency statistics indicate that many consumers did in fact use their economic stimulus checks, in part, to pay down past-due credit card debt,” according to TransUnion’s Ezra Becker. “However, with most ‘big-box’ stores meeting or exceeding financial analyst expectations during the quarter, and considering the increase in credit card balance statistics over the quarter, it seems that a significant portion of those rebates did indeed find their way back into the economy.”

TransUnion’s TrueCredit.com poll in February found that 42 percent of respondents said they would pay down debt, 20 percent would save the money and 16 percent said they would buy something they consider necessary. Only five percent said they would splurge.

A CreditCards.com poll conducted March 7-9 by GfK Roper Public Affairs & Media found that nearly half of Americans planned to either pay debts (26 percent) or save the rebate (24 percent) rather than spend it.

What next?
According to reports, members of Congress this week are discussing the possibility of a second stimulus package with as much as $68 billion. Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has said he supports a “second stimulus package” of $30 billion to help “stabilize and strengthen the economy, provide aid to homeowners and states hardest-hit by the housing crisis, and extend and expand unemployment insurance.”

If approved, the question is how much of that stimulus money will spur the economy and how much will go toward making a dent in the nearly $1 trillion U.S. revolving credit card debt.

 

NOTE: This blog made it into the 31st Money Hacks carnival hosted by Moolanomy. The theme: economic crisis and bailout.

See related: Poll: Half of America won’t spend their ‘stimulus’ rebate, Credit card debt up, delinquencies down in Q2, report says, Tax rebate: Even those who saved ended up spending

Join the Discussion

We encourage an active and insightful conversation among our users. Please help us keep our community civil and respectful. For your safety, we ask that you do not disclose confidential or personal information such as your bank account numbers, social security numbers, etc. Keep in mind that anything you post may be disclosed, published, transmitted or reused.

The editorial content on CreditCards.com is not sponsored by any bank or credit card issuer. The journalists in the editorial department are separate from the company's business operations. The comments posted below are not provided, reviewed or approved by any company mentioned in our editorial content. Additionally, any companies mentioned in the content do not assume responsibility to ensure that all posts and/or questions are answered.

  • Charles Scott

    I have written my Congressmen that instead of penalizing the senior citizens, these second stimulus checks should increase to $600. Reduce the checks to families.
    Seniors are no longer interested in savings and are unlikely to carry much debt. Therefore, a larger amount of this money would find its way into stimulating the economy. Its very simple logic and economics.
    Remember, seniors buy gifts for grandchildren which would likely more than do the trick.

  • Pam

    NO… do NOT reduce the checks to families. I can’t afford a credit card. I need the money to buy things for my children. They don’t have grandparents either. Using your logic, my children would loose out all the way around!

  • Wanda Wilson

    Instead of stimulus checks, I propose anmensty on credit history reports. Let the banks pay us back for the bail outs. It makes as much sense as bailing out those same banks that charge exorbitant fees and negatively impact our credit history with erroneous reports we cannot get removed, no matter how many times we refute it.

  • KevinGL

    Everything has a purpose,though life itself is a struggle,human being knows where to resort for thier survival.They decide to
    put Obama in the right place,at the White house building.With the help of the lower effective officials Obama may reconstruct
    and put the remedy needed of the United State.Plans shoud be put in hand.All of these are possible if everyone in the US
    government are fully functioning to thier assign task.Obama as the head of the said institution must know how to governhis
    people.While, Governor Rick Perry of the state of Texas is no stranger to the said controversy. First of all, Governor Perry
    governs the state that
    has ordered over a full third of all executions in the U.S. since the reinstatement of capital punishment. On a lighter note,
    Texas is the home to the Dallas Cowboys. (Well, at least they’re friendly to payday loans.) Governor Rick Perry has also
    done everything in his power to refuse any stimulus payment from President Obama. His reasoning is that accepting the funds
    will require him to restructure and redefine the terms of unemployment benefits in his state so that more people will have
    easier access to those benefits. Governor Schwarzenegger of California has gone on record stating that any funds that Governor Rick
    Perry refuses will be gladly accepted by California.