|
Living with credit (429)
|
New, interesting products (100)
|
Research, regulation, industry reports (233)
|
Rewards (41)
|
Protecting yourself (163)
|
The fine print (71)
|
Credit card miscellany (375)
|
Add category (1)
|
Celebrity Money Watch (4)
Embossed credit cards, we raised you right, but maybe it's time to move onWith all of the sweeping changes surrounding the new credit card reform act, there's talk about changing the look and feel of conventional credit cards as well. A few of weeks ago, New York Times technology columnist David Pogue posted a question from reader Dale Bengston: "Why are we still squinting to read those raised numbers on our credit cards? Why is our credit card number not printed on the card in a more human-friendly way?" Bengston explains that he uses his credit card in only three ways:
Which raises the question: Why DO we still use the ugly, embossed text of the 1960s?
We have the magnetic strip. We even have contactless RFID chip credit cards. And, for online or phone purchases, a unembossed set of numbers would suffice. So why are credit card numbers still raised, bumpy and unattractive? After a delving into countless credit card forums and credit card company Web sites, I think I know the answer: Even though electronic credit card processing has been standardized, when the electricity goes out, what do merchants do? They go old school. Writing down credit card numbers is shady, and the only way to process payments efficiently in no-Internet situations is to bust out the old carbon copy card reader. Those ancient manual credit card terminals (commonly referred to as "knuckle-busters" or "zip zap machines" that emit a noise that Bengston describes as "ca-chunk ca-chunk ") seem obsolete in most stores and restaurants. But, in fact, many places still use the old "ca-chunk ca-chunk" machine: Crafts shows, trade shows, taxi drivers and venues with busted credit card readers frequently use these, because merchants don't have to, or don't have the means to, connect to a payments network to accept credit card payments.
Visa doesn't think that raised numbers are necessary, though. Last September, the corporation announced it would let issuers use unembossed credit cards -- with numbers simply printed onto the card, not raised up Braille-style. The lack of embossed characters saves production time and manufacturing costs and makes for a smoother card. It hasn't caught on. Perhaps consumers are scared of flat cards' lack of an authentic, credit-cardy feel. Without the raised numbers, they pretty much look like those make-believe credit cards we sometimes get in mail offers. MasterCard also offers an unembossed card. According to Mastercard Unembossed's Web site, the card front reads "100% ELECTRONIC" to "inform consumers that merchants will be processing their transactions using their electronic terminals." And that means ONLY through electronic terminals. If merchants don't process the credit card electronically, but instead, just write down the numbers, the merchant "may carry additional liability." Basically, if a businesses' credit card reader is screwy, you shouldn't make a purchase. So, if you're thinking about getting an unembossed credit or debit card for its smooth, modern look and feel, remember to carry a fat wad of backup cash. 4 Comment(s)Leave a comment |
About
They're the pieces of plastic we love, and love to hate. Get the latest news, tips, research and more from the CreditCards.com staff.
Archives
All Blogs
Filter by: This month
TagsOther Voices and BlogsUseful LinksSubscribe to Taking Charge |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I work at a business that does not accept printed credit cards, they MUST be embossed. We have been burned in the past by people who have printed card numbers on the fake in the mail cards we all get. Unembossed is NOT the way to go.
Umm, Debbie, did the "fake" cards have the proper holograms? Did they electronically authorize properly? If not, I don't think that is the cards fault, or any reason not to accept *VALID* unembossed cards...
For the second time in my history of using credit cards, my number was stolen. The way it was used fraudulently was that one merchant read the card number printed on the front of the card, and/or took an imprint, rubbing or cell-phone photo of it and then passed the number on to another criminal who overwrote THEIR own card, magnetically, with my numbers using an illegally-owned encoding machine. Then, they have their own card with their own name on it (which matches their own drivers license or other ID's) but with MY credit account numbers on it. As long as card companies DO continue printing the numbers on the cards, they will continue to be used without authorization.
I finally got one of these in the mail. I was not offered a choice. It's a Chase Sapphire card, and if Chase is going this way, I don't think merchants will get by refusing them.
I already have problems with cards being refused, not because of lack of bumps but lack of chips. In Europe, "PIN and Chip" is standard. Everything from cashiers to waiters with hand held readers use them and your card stays in your possession. There's no way to clone them and if stolen they're no good without the PIN. In an era of cell phones and handheld devices, I don't think we need to worry about garage sales and craft shows, the latter of which always seems to have a reader anyway even outdoors.